Or how my journey into Google’s new social media project reminded me that nothing dies on the Internet…
Friday: I spend downtime in the office researching Google+ — reading the Huffington Post’s 6 Things Google+ has that Facebook doesn’t, studying screen shots of the website and reading commentary on the new social media project on various blogs.
Originally skeptic and feeling a surprising sense of loyalty to Facebook (a website I have begrudgingly accepted as a part of my life and career), I’m surprised it sounds so…cool.
Granted, Google fails to convince me that Hangouts aren’t creepy (can you kick someone out of open video chats?), but the idea of Circles, which allow users to make distinctions between what content people can see, is ingenious.
Weekend: Contemplation. Can I really maintain another social media site? Are people actually using said social media site? And: please, oh please, let it be uncomplicated.
Monday: By Monday, I am convinced that I will join for the following reasons:
- You know, that journalism thing. Chances are, keeping track of popular opinion and new trends in addition to networking and sourcing opportunities will lead me to the site anyway.
- An unrelenting curiosity. Often associated with the above.
- Facebook, which informs me others are giving Google+ a shot. (I pause to wonder if this is ironic.)
- The apparent difference between “joining Circles” on Google+ and “friending” someone on Facebook. (Adding someone to your Circles on the former doesn’t require any effort on the person you are adding; it just allows you access to their public information. So is Google+ more like an interactive RSS feed than Facebook’s build-an-army-of-exclusive-friends-opportunity?)
- Googling, “Can I delete Google+?” Unlike Facebook, Google+ can be deleted.
Sold.
Convinced I can back out if I want to, and deciding not to delay the inevitable, I give it a try.
Here’s the part where I join and have an unexpected run-in with…
I type in my name and birthday and click Join Google+.
The first things I notice on my empty profile page are Google-generated suggested users.
My suggestions? Jacqui Banaszynski, a fellow J-schooler and a priest I just interviewed for a recent story about the pro-life movement.
And while I know I signed up for this, watching my Gmail contacts streamed into Google+ suggestions instantly makes me a little nervous.
I think it’s the priest.
He is someone I’ve had a brief and professional relationship with, who doesn’t even have a Google+ account, but can now receive content from my social media site via email with a click of the Share button that is glowing beside his head.
Yes, yes I know he can’t see my content unless I decide to share it. Yes, I know that’s the whole point of Google+. And that’s nice.
But his smiling picture on the side of my screen makes me feel like I’ve already made a connection I don’t want, though I understand we’re not connected yet. (And all this before I’ve even tapped into Circles!)
Here I feel pressure to make myself interesting and bail on the bio…
A little unsettled, I move on to the bio page. It looks like Facebook’s.
Truth be told, I’m exhausted of these things. I can only make myself sound charming, sophisticated, down-to-earth and interesting in so many ways.
After checking out some other profiles, I’m glad to see that many people haven’t filled in their bios yet either. Maybe they are over self-obsessed explanations. Maybe they haven’t decided what identity they’d like to embody on this website yet.
I can’t decide either, so I focus on occupation. But apparently, employment doesn’t mean internships, because I can’t specify months of the year as I list the various positions I’ve held in the last three years. So for now, The Columbia Missourian and Philadelphia City Paper both say 2010, which is misleading because I didn’t work at either newspaper for a full year.
*Note to Google, work on this.
Here my past hits me in the face — in neat little photo albums…
I decide not to worry about it too hard, because I’m distracted by the photo album section. Namely, I already have several, despite not having uploaded any photos yet.
There’s the photos I’ve posted to a private Blogger called “Parti Pak Goes to College”, that as the title may suggest, is private for a reason — it documents the college adventures of five of my high school friends at various universities across the country. (Hey, it’s easier than calling five people to tell the same story and Blogger has some nice, scenic backgrounds these days.)
And there they are, all lined up nicely in a neat little photo albums with that familiar share button next to it.
No thanks.
Every photo I’ve ever included in any Blogger post is there, actually, including pictures from blogs I’ve deleted. There are all the multiple pictures of starting blocks that I experimented with as headers on my blog, The Starting Block, which was originally hosted on Blogger before its current WordPress host.
I haven’t seen these photos in years. Weird.
Here I discover Circles; they make so much sense…
On to Circles. I’m already in two. Apparently you don’t have to actually be on Google+ to be in someone’s circles? This I need to figure out.
I start adding. The majority of my suggested viewers are J-schoolers. So I make a circle and label it “J-schoolers.” I decide to make a different one for “Mizzou faculty.”
Drag and drop.
This is easy enough. I even smile. This part makes sense.
I move onto the wall. I realize I’ve called it a wall. I wonder what the Google term is for that-place-where-you-share-stuff.
No one’s posting anything, save for a few. Jim MacMillan quickly dominates my news feed stream. Not to fear, however. A recent Google+ post by an avid Google fan suggests that this simply means I’m using the website incorrectly. After raving about the wealth of information at her fingertips, she writes:
My friends, however, don’t seem to be having the same Google+ experience I am. My tendency so far has been to add as many people with as many interesting views as possible to my Circles, and then to read voraciously and respond all over the place. Meanwhile, my real-life friends are complaining that there’s not enough content to appease them, and I’m the only one dominating their Streams. Why is this happening for them? I think it comes from a fundamental set of expectations about moving from Facebook to Google+. People are treating their Google+ accounts just like Facebook accounts. And I think that’s a doomed approach.
Here I find an empty wasteland of profiles…
Determined not to see my circles as “friends,” I prepare to add randoms to my circles. But I’m not sure where to find people interesting without knowing that they are interesting.
And their profiles are no help. I read that scrimping on bio information is actually Google+ suicide, as many people search for contacts by topic or interests. But I still can’t seem to figure out how to do that. Help?
I look at other profiles to determine what people claim they are interested in. I see the typical smiling profile pictures and some basic information. A few have jumped on the bandwagon and clearly have some neat posts. But in terms of sharing information, many people’s pages are empty wastelands of white.
It’s like everyone is waiting at the sidelines, eager to see where the game is going, but not ready to jump in and play yet.
And in the end, I’m not too worried about it. Google+ will catch on or it won’t. I have more to explore on the site (Sparks? Huddles?) and I suspect its numbers will continue to increase.
Here I explain my new sense of caution with social media, while admitting that I have no real intentions of stopping…
That’s not what bothers me slightly as I sign off with a small idea of what Google+ is about.
Mostly, my exploration into Google+ serves as a simple reminder —
Nothing dies on the Internet, whether it’s private, public, in your circle or my circle, locked in privacy protection or deleted.
And as I stand perched on the sideline with everyone else who isn’t quite sure how to use Google+, this is what I think of:
I may be able to differentiate what I share and who I share it with, but I worry about a day when I might want to take all this sharing back.
It’s a tired message, I know, and a duh-duh statement. I feel like a lame version of Rooney Mara in The Social Network. (The Internet’s not written in pencil, Mark, it’s written in ink!)
Perhaps I’m just overwhelmed by the idea of another social media site. And, don’t get me wrong, I’m genuinely excited and intrigued to see where Google+ goes and experiment with Circles to share and absorb news…(Disclaimer I fully intend to blast this post through Facebook, Twitter and Google+ to see what happens.)
But this time, unlike my enthusiastic, if not impulsive dabbles in Facebook and Blogger and WordPress and Twitter and LinkedIn, I’m feeling sort of comfortable on the sidelines.
I’m hesitant to fill that white abyss.